The Court of Justice proposes that . . . . Instead of looking at hybrid contracting agreements, courts should recognize that these agreements, like other glue contracts, essentially constitute “general consent” on terms that are not objectively inappropriate. If this framework is accepted, these concepts should be subject to rigorous scrutiny of content content content, perhaps to a greater extent than before. Amazon considers that, since each party can terminate the contract at any time, the contract is a contract and that Amazon is not required to re-enter a blocked account, even if it is false. The Washington law seems to support their position, and the Western District of Washington and the Ninth Circuit have confirmed such at-will regulation in a case involving Amazon in the past. For customers who may be facing counterfeits on Amazon`s platform or committed by Amazon itself, the exercise of intellectual property rights can be a way to avoid arbitration. Any dispute or claim relating to your use of an Amazon service or products or services sold or distributed by Amazon or through Amazon.com is settled through mandatory arbitration and not through the courts, except that you can file claims in court for small claims if your claims are justified. This agreement is governed by the Federal Arbitration and Federal Arbitration Act. Mr Nicosia continued Amazon.com, saying he should have done more to prevent the sale of a product containing an illegal drug on his website.  The company responded by requesting that the arbitration be imposed and that the proceedings be closed on the basis of the compromise clause in its online terms or that it be interpreted as an alternative.